Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-09 Thread Sarvela, Tomi P
It seems that the chops to be built has been re-defined several times in pipelines. Fixed. https://github.com/intel-innersource/drivers.gpu.i915.ci.pipelines/commit/89d2f8174a15585c082b2f714551225ba6cafe08 Tomi From: Sarvela, Tomi P Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:27 PM To: 'intel-gfx@lists.free

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
Ok, slightly delayed by dinner, but commit caf6912f3f4a ("swap: fix swapfile read/write offset") is out in my tree now. Dave - can you check that the current -git works for your CI people? Thanks, Linus On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 3/2/21 6:01 PM, Linus

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/2/21 6:01 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:36 PM Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> Or if you want a pull, just let me know. Have another misc patch to >> flush out anyway that doesn't belong in any of my usual branches. > > Ok, if you have something else pending anyway, let's do th

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:36 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > Or if you want a pull, just let me know. Have another misc patch to > flush out anyway that doesn't belong in any of my usual branches. Ok, if you have something else pending anyway, let's do that. Send me the pull request, and I'll take it asa

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/2/21 5:15 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/2/21 4:56 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> Looks like Jens saw it at least, he posted this on twitter a few mins >>> ago so I assume it'll be incoming soon. >>> >>> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-bl

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/2/21 4:56 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Looks like Jens saw it at least, he posted this on twitter a few mins >> ago so I assume it'll be incoming soon. >> >> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=swap-fix > > Ahh. You use a sw

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > Looks like Jens saw it at least, he posted this on twitter a few mins > ago so I assume it'll be incoming soon. > > https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=swap-fix Ahh. You use a swap file. This might be the same thing that I think t

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 09:28, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Adding the right people. > > It seems that the three commits that needed reverting are > > f885056a48cc ("mm: simplify swapdev_block") > 3e3126cf2a6d ("mm: only make map_swap_entry available for > CONFIG_HIBERNATION") > 48d15436fde6 ("m

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
Adding the right people. It seems that the three commits that needed reverting are f885056a48cc ("mm: simplify swapdev_block") 3e3126cf2a6d ("mm: only make map_swap_entry available for CONFIG_HIBERNATION") 48d15436fde6 ("mm: remove get_swap_bio") and while they look very harmless to me, le

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 03:27, Sarvela, Tomi P wrote: > > The regression has been identified; Chris Wilson found commits touching > > swapfile.c, and reverting them the issue couldn’t be reproduced any more. > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/87549/ > > > > This revert will be applied

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Sarvela, Tomi P
The regression has been identified; Chris Wilson found commits touching swapfile.c, and reverting them the issue couldn't be reproduced any more. https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/87549/ This revert will be applied to core-for-CI branch. When new CI_DRM has been built, shard-testing will b

Re: [Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Sarvela, Tomi P
More information (excuse my top-posting): - Issue happens in igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded Mlocking phase, before "starting subtest" appears. - Filesystem trashed is the one containing swapfile - If swap is partition, it seems that the swap signature is correct even after running the test,

[Intel-gfx] Public i915 CI shardruns are disabled

2021-03-02 Thread Sarvela, Tomi P
Hello, The linux i915 CI shardruns have been disabled. This is due to the unfortunate filesystem-corrupting bug first seen in linux-next 20210215, which now has been merged to linus 5.12-rc1 and further on to DRM-Tip, first instance seen in CI_DRM_9818. Last changes coming in were: fb3b93df7979 d