Re: [Intel-gfx] Implementing Miracast

2017-06-01 Thread Martin Peres
On 01/06/17 09:02, Daniel Kasak wrote: Any news? Seems every TV I bump into these days has Miracast support ... Sorry, it must be frustrating. Some code needs to be re-implemented because it was GPL-based and we need it as MIT. Until I have some time to do this, this will probably not move fo

Re: [Intel-gfx] Implementing Miracast

2017-05-31 Thread Daniel Kasak
Any news? Seems every TV I bump into these days has Miracast support ... On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Martin Peres wrote: > On 07/03/17 05:00, Daniel Kasak wrote: >> >> Any news on this? I'm also interested :) >> >> Dan > > > Hmm, good question! I will ping internally and see if we are ready

Re: [Intel-gfx] Implementing Miracast

2017-03-07 Thread Martin Peres
On 07/03/17 05:00, Daniel Kasak wrote: Any news on this? I'm also interested :) Dan Hmm, good question! I will ping internally and see if we are ready to release something as an RFC. Martin ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: [Intel-gfx] Implementing Miracast

2017-03-06 Thread Daniel Kasak
Any news on this? I'm also interested :) Dan On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Martin Peres wrote: > On 03/01/17 22:47, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, norbert wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> about a year ago there was a discussion about Implementing Miracast on >>> this list: >>> >>> http

Re: [Intel-gfx] Implementing Miracast

2017-01-03 Thread Martin Peres
On 03/01/17 22:47, Jani Nikula wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, norbert wrote: Hello, about a year ago there was a discussion about Implementing Miracast on this list: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-December/096035.html Since then I could not find further information about t

Re: [Intel-gfx] Implementing Miracast

2017-01-03 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, norbert wrote: > Hello, > about a year ago there was a discussion about Implementing Miracast on > this list: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-December/096035.html > > Since then I could not find further information about that topic there. > So maybe