Re: [Intel-gfx] From work_struct to tasklet_struct

2016-05-19 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:48:29AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Just a small set to convert our irq bottom-halves to use a tasklet > instead of a work_struct. In theory, the tasklet has lower latency > from the interrupt (or lower upper bound at least), but in practice I > think it is clearer to be

[Intel-gfx] From work_struct to tasklet_struct

2016-05-19 Thread Chris Wilson
Just a small set to convert our irq bottom-halves to use a tasklet instead of a work_struct. In theory, the tasklet has lower latency from the interrupt (or lower upper bound at least), but in practice I think it is clearer to be consistent in using tasklets for irq bh. -Chris