2011/11/28 Adam Jackson
> On 11/28/11 12:28 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:53:11 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits
are correct to pro
On 11/28/11 12:28 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:53:11 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits
are correct to program here, but intel_bios.h documents only the la
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:53:11 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits
> > are correct to program here, but intel_bios.h documents only the layout
> > of that structure, not its
Thanks for re-raising, Adam.
2011/10/26 Adam Jackson
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits
> > are correct to program here, but intel_bios.h documents only the layout
> > of that structure, not its c
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I assume the SDVO LVDS options block in the VBT would tell us what bits
> are correct to program here, but intel_bios.h documents only the layout
> of that structure, not its content. Or, we can hope that the SDVO card
> set it up correctly
