On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:02 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:57:51PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > So any change this patch enter in fedora kernel ? or have this patch
> > against fedora kernels ?
>
> It's unlikely to end up in any current Fedora releases bec
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:57:51PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> My technique to recompile kernels, now, is based on src.rpm at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
Yeah, I'm afraid that's not going to work.
> So any change this patch enter in fedora kernel ? or
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:46 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:45:11PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > Can you give this patch a
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:45:11PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
> > > ought to work.
>
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
> > ought to work.
>
> It would, of course, be more useful if I included the patch.
Hum can't appl
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
> ought to work.
It would, of course, be more useful if I included the patch.
commit bd599ffa48a679679434109ead29fcdf108ccc77
Author: Matthew Garrett
Date: We
Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but
ought to work.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
