Re: [Intel-gfx] A few clean-ups and a baby step towards unified register definitions

2014-01-07 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:41:43PM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > On 01/06/2014 07:02 AM, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > Having one source for registers defines sounds like a good idea. These > > patches, > > written long ago, were a baby step towards that goal by cleaning-up the > > INSTDONE definito

Re: [Intel-gfx] A few clean-ups and a baby step towards unified register definitions

2014-01-06 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On 01/06/2014 07:02 AM, Damien Lespiau wrote: > Having one source for registers defines sounds like a good idea. These > patches, > written long ago, were a baby step towards that goal by cleaning-up the > INSTDONE definitons to be like the kernel ones. > > Along the way, I removed one tool that

[Intel-gfx] A few clean-ups and a baby step towards unified register definitions

2014-01-06 Thread Damien Lespiau
Having one source for registers defines sounds like a good idea. These patches, written long ago, were a baby step towards that goal by cleaning-up the INSTDONE definitons to be like the kernel ones. Along the way, I removed one tool that isn't even compiled and another unusued one. -- Damien _