On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 09:03:45AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > humn... PORT_F. KBL doesn't have PORT_F. We decided to keep the handling
> > > of DISPLAY_
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
humn... PORT_F. KBL doesn't have PORT_F. We decided to keep the handling
of DISPLAY_VER == 10 and DISPLAY_VER == 9 together and trust the VBT,
but when the VBT is n
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:55:23AM -0400, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> humn... PORT_F. KBL doesn't have PORT_F. We decided to keep the handling
> of DISPLAY_VER == 10 and DISPLAY_VER == 9 together and trust the VBT,
> but when the VBT is not present, DDI F will get added unconditio.
>
> maybe best thi
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:24:30AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 05:18:18PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
could you please try this small patch?
I had to hand apply it as it wa corruped to due to cut off context.
It fixes one of the warnings, new output below:
[4.1
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:05:49PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2021.07.21 13:10:49 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a baseline
> > 5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly happy:
> >
>
> I thi
On 2021.07.21 13:10:49 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a baseline
> 5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly happy:
>
I think we also got bug report on those display related warnings, should be
some i
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 05:18:18PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> could you please try this small patch?
I had to hand apply it as it wa corruped to due to cut off context.
It fixes one of the warnings, new output below:
[4.182820] i915 :00:04.0: [drm] Virtual GPU for Intel GVT-g detected.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:40:03PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a
> > > > baseline
> > > > 5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly hap
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:43:44PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a baseline
> > > 5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly happy:
> >
> > Is this a regression over -rc1 or over 5.13?
> > Bisect possible?
>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 07:24:47AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:10:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a baseline
> > 5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly happy:
>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:10:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a baseline
> 5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly happy:
Is this a regression over -rc1 or over 5.13?
Bisect possible?
Could you
Hi all,
I'm trying to test some changes for the gvt code, but even with a baseline
5.14-rc2 host and guest the 915 driver does not seem overly happy:
[5.693099] i915 :00:04.0: [drm] Virtual GPU for Intel GVT-g detected.
[5.694841] i915 :00:04.0: [drm] VT-d active for gfx access
[
12 matches
Mail list logo
