Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-08-01 Thread Valerio Camassa
I tried to change .drirc to add the xml for dri2 but glxgears still rating ~60FPS. Also with "$ vblank_mode=0 glxgears" it rates ~60FPS. Il 01/08/2010 17:26, Robert Hooker ha scritto: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Valerio Camassa wrote: I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and wit

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-08-01 Thread Robert Hooker
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Valerio Camassa wrote: >  I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, > but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: >> >> 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS > > With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. > ___

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Valerio Camassa
62.175 FPS ≠ 700 FPS Why do you write it is the same? Thanks, Paul Sorry, I wrote, soon after, that I mistyped. Is with 2.10 that glxgears rates ~700fps. With 2.11 and 2.12 rates ~60fps. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Samstag, den 31.07.2010, 10:36 +0200 schrieb Valerio Camassa: > I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param > vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: > > 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS > > With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. 62.175 FPS ≠ 700

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Valerio Camassa wrote: >  I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, > but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: >> >> 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS > > With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. Look, as Owain pointed

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Valerio Camassa
Ops, It's with with 2.10 i obtain ~700FPS, i mistyped, sorry. I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: >/ 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS / With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. ___

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-31 Thread Valerio Camassa
I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freed

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-30 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 15:20 +0200, Camassa Valerio wrote: > the vsync problem is solved with downgrade to 2.10 drivers and > i would to say how can i disable vsync in new driver? i watched the > configure compile options of mesa and drv-intel packages, but i didn't > find anything. It's not a c

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-30 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:17:30PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote: > Hi, > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) > gives > me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. I'l

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-30 Thread Camassa Valerio
Hi, i have the same problems with 2.11 and 2.12 intel driver and mesa 7.8. In 3D application i have annoying stuttering and in glxgears (and others 3d application) i don't obtain more than 60fps (i think is active vsync). The stuttering problem is mitigated with mesa 7.9 (but is not solved),

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 28/07/2010 23:17, Hanno Böck a écrit : > Hi, > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) > gives > me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. > > From the logs ever

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 29.07.2010 18:24, schrieb Matt Turner: > You're saying it's slow, but in relation to what? Were previous > versions faster, or is the comparison being made between hardware? Well I see the same problem here, using OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 29.07.2010, 12:24 -0400 schrieb Matt Turner: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hanno Böck wrote: > > Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: > >> When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D > >> output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hanno Böck wrote: > Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: >> When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D >> output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, >> 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel dri

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: > When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D > output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, > 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel driver 2.11 and 2.12, > without a change to the stuttering. T

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:29:02 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: > Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > > > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to st

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) > > gives me 57 fps. I think ev

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > Hi, > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives > me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. > > From the logs e

[Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-28 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for w