On 9/21/2020 13:36, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
On 9/21/2020 12:22 PM, John Harrison wrote:
On 9/16/2020 23:48, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:22:45PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
Hello,
The failures below all appear to be because the new GuC firmware
was not
found on the
On 9/21/2020 12:22 PM, John Harrison wrote:
On 9/16/2020 23:48, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:22:45PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
Hello,
The failures below all appear to be because the new GuC firmware was
not
found on the test system.
My understanding is that all we nee
On 9/16/2020 23:48, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:22:45PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
Hello,
The failures below all appear to be because the new GuC firmware was not
found on the test system.
My understanding is that all we need to do to get the CI system to update
with new f
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:22:45PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The failures below all appear to be because the new GuC firmware was not
> found on the test system.
>
> My understanding is that all we need to do to get the CI system to update
> with new firmwares is to push the firmwa
+ Tomi
> -Original Message-
> From: John Harrison
> Sent: torstai 17. syyskuuta 2020 4.23
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Latvala, Petri ;
> Saarinen, Jani ; Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
>
> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC v49
>
> Hello,
>
> The fail
Hello,
The failures below all appear to be because the new GuC firmware was not
found on the test system.
My understanding is that all we need to do to get the CI system to
update with new firmwares is to push the firmware to a branch on the FDO
drm-firmware repo and then send a pull request
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC v49
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/81761/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9019 -> Patchwork_18516
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Seri
