On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > - save_stack_trace(&b->stack_trace);
> > > + b->stack_len = stack_trace_save(b->stack_entries, MAX_STACK, 2);
>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of
> the storage array based interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
> Cc: Mike Snitzer
> Cc: Alasdair Kergon
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:11:44 +0200
Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Gleixner
> > > wrote:
> > > > - save_stack_trace(&b->stack_trac
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > - save_stack_trace(&b->stack_trace);
> > + b->stack_len = stack_trace_save(b->stack_entries, MAX_STACK, 2);
> As noted in one of similar patches before, can we have an inline
>
Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of
the storage array based interface.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
Cc: Mike Snitzer
Cc: Alasdair Kergon
---
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions
