On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:41:28PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > - I think we need to make it very clear that piglit should still be
> > developed upstream. So local changes shouldn't be allowed at all imo.
>
> Sure, I'll wait u
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> - I think we need to make it very clear that piglit should still be
> developed upstream. So local changes shouldn't be allowed at all imo.
Sure, I'll wait until my patches are upstreamed to resend the series
without the local patc
tel-gfx] [igt] Making the test-suite easier to run
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:33:17PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > The objective of this series is to make the test-suite easier to run
> > by embedding a copy a piglit and providing porcelain on top of it in
> >
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:33:17PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> The objective of this series is to make the test-suite easier to run by
> embedding a copy a piglit and providing porcelain on top of it in the form of
> a
> makefile target. Beside python, there's no external dependency to run the
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:33:17PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Another useful feature is to be able to resume an interrupted run. To
> do that, make run-tests needs to know which run we are talking about:
There's a known bug with piglit here in that resuming doesn't conserve
--
The objective of this series is to make the test-suite easier to run by
embedding a copy a piglit and providing porcelain on top of it in the form of a
makefile target. Beside python, there's no external dependency to run the test
suite after this series.
The provided makefile target runs the full
