On ti, 2016-03-08 at 09:36 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > btw I don't think this vblank issue would be very significant. The main
> > targeted usage of GVT-g is for server virtualization/cloud, where
> > a remoting protocol is required for customer to see the content through
> > n
> From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 4:37 PM
>
> Hi,
>
> > btw I don't think this vblank issue would be very significant. The main
> > targeted usage of GVT-g is for server virtualization/cloud, where
> > a remoting protocol is required for customer t
Hi,
> btw I don't think this vblank issue would be very significant. The main
> targeted usage of GVT-g is for server virtualization/cloud, where
> a remoting protocol is required for customer to see the content through
> network.
The plan for that is to let the gpu video encoder process the g
> From: Zhiyuan Lv
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 9:26 AM
>
> > > The igvt device model is responsible for injecting vblank interrupts to
> > > VMs
> > > for i915 running inside. Currently we have a timer for the regular vblank
> > > injection. So if needed, host i915 can notify gvt device model
