Re: [Intel-gfx] [i-g-t PATCH v7 2/5] lib: add igt_dummyload

2016-11-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:07:33PM +0200, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: > > > On 16.11.2016 15:56, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:18:01PM +0200, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: > >> A lot of igt testcases need some GPU workload to make sure a race > >> window is big enough. Unfortunately havi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [i-g-t PATCH v7 2/5] lib: add igt_dummyload

2016-11-16 Thread Abdiel Janulgue
On 16.11.2016 15:56, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:18:01PM +0200, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: >> A lot of igt testcases need some GPU workload to make sure a race >> window is big enough. Unfortunately having a fixed amount of >> workload leads to spurious test failures or overtly l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [i-g-t PATCH v7 2/5] lib: add igt_dummyload

2016-11-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:18:01PM +0200, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: > A lot of igt testcases need some GPU workload to make sure a race > window is big enough. Unfortunately having a fixed amount of > workload leads to spurious test failures or overtly long runtimes > on some fast/slow platforms. This

[Intel-gfx] [i-g-t PATCH v7 2/5] lib: add igt_dummyload

2016-11-16 Thread Abdiel Janulgue
A lot of igt testcases need some GPU workload to make sure a race window is big enough. Unfortunately having a fixed amount of workload leads to spurious test failures or overtly long runtimes on some fast/slow platforms. This library contains functionality to submit GPU workloads that should consu