[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 DRM fix

2011-08-19 Thread Jesse Barnes
The following changes since commit 5ccc38740a283aba81a00e92941310d0c1aeb2ee: Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block (2011-08-19 10:47:07 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/drm-intel for-linus Keith is ou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-08 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:00:45 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Jim Gettys wrote: > > On 03/07/2011 07:00 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > >> Dave, hopefully this completes the regression fixes for .38. There is > >> still some doubt over eDP, with 011b9910bdaf failing for J

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:27:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > drm-intel-next on my HP laptop fails on boot with some GMBUS error and I have > to s/r to see gdm on it ;-) > > We have a week more with rc8 so maybe we can get some movement or ideas. Unfortunately, the US team, Jesse included, will be pre

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-07 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Jim Gettys wrote: > On 03/07/2011 04:28 PM, Jim Gettys wrote: >> >> On 03/07/2011 07:00 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> >>> Dave, hopefully this completes the regression fixes for .38. There is >>> still some doubt over eDP, with 011b9910bdaf failing for Jim Gettys but

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-07 Thread Jim Gettys
On 03/07/2011 04:28 PM, Jim Gettys wrote: On 03/07/2011 07:00 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: Dave, hopefully this completes the regression fixes for .38. There is still some doubt over eDP, with 011b9910bdaf failing for Jim Gettys but seeming required for other (currently working in .37) machines. And

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-07 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Jim Gettys wrote: > On 03/07/2011 07:00 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> Dave, hopefully this completes the regression fixes for .38. There is >> still some doubt over eDP, with 011b9910bdaf failing for Jim Gettys but >> seeming required for other (currently working in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-07 Thread Jim Gettys
On 03/07/2011 07:00 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: Dave, hopefully this completes the regression fixes for .38. There is still some doubt over eDP, with 011b9910bdaf failing for Jim Gettys but seeming required for other (currently working in .37) machines. And despite Linus's intervention, backlight con

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 next

2011-03-07 Thread Chris Wilson
A little later than I had intended, but fortunately I've resisted the temptation to drop in any last minute patch bombs. Compared with recent history this has been an uneventful cycle, with a lot of the recent work being not yet ready for merging. This cycle has mostly been concerned with bug fixe

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-07 Thread Chris Wilson
Dave, hopefully this completes the regression fixes for .38. There is still some doubt over eDP, with 011b9910bdaf failing for Jim Gettys but seeming required for other (currently working in .37) machines. And despite Linus's intervention, backlight controls are still broken for some users. I've t

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-03-01 Thread Chris Wilson
As I don't anticipate any more fixes in the near future for 2.6.38, I thought I may as well send this single patch to prevent 965G[M] from using a status page above 4GiB, in a timely fashion. -Chris The following changes since commit dd9c1549edef02290edced639f67b54a25abbe0e: Linux 2.6.38-rc7 (2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-02-24 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:09:47 + Chris Wilson wrote: > Dave, time has flown by, so, against all evidence to the contrary, I must > have been enjoying myself. > > An assortment of regression fixes are still trickling in; the sampler for > tiled surfaces on gen2 being more nasty than expected, i

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-02-23 Thread Chris Wilson
Dave, time has flown by, so, against all evidence to the contrary, I must have been enjoying myself. An assortment of regression fixes are still trickling in; the sampler for tiled surfaces on gen2 being more nasty than expected, interrupts during fdi training were less than useful and Jesse assur

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-02-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:04:49 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:58:03 +, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > Dave, a few more days have passed and we have a fresh batch of > > regression fixes. > > > > The patch that is most notable is one for its absence: > > > > commit 25ed6eb15ebc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-02-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:58:03 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Dave, a few more days have passed and we have a fresh batch of > regression fixes. > > The patch that is most notable is one for its absence: > > commit 25ed6eb15ebc4472fb0e473666c0ef3bba87097f > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Wed Dec 2

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-02-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Dave, a few more days have passed and we have a fresh batch of regression fixes. The patch that is most notable is one for its absence: commit 25ed6eb15ebc4472fb0e473666c0ef3bba87097f Author: Chris Wilson Date: Wed Dec 22 11:37:09 2010 + agp/intel: Experiment with a 855GM GWB bit is

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 fixes

2011-02-01 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Dave, a fairly busy week or two of bouncing .38 regression fixes off testers. A great big thanks to the QA at Suse who have been very responsive and helped a great deal with these patches. In the wings, as always, we have more patches under test, mainly focusing on stability fixes for SNB and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 regressions

2010-10-03 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 11:33:36 +0100 Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi Linus, > > still a fair few regressions popping up in the i915 driver. Julia > spotted an old bug in our error handling that could cause the > aperture to be consumed with unpinnable buffers, Keith found that the > wait-for-vblank han

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915 regressions

2010-10-03 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Linus, still a fair few regressions popping up in the i915 driver. Julia spotted an old bug in our error handling that could cause the aperture to be consumed with unpinnable buffers, Keith found that the wait-for-vblank handling changes were not correct for DP, Jesse failed at basic math (an

[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] i915 regression fixes

2010-09-26 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Linus, a couple of fixes for some recent regressions. The following changes since commit 32163f4b2cef28a5aab8b226ffecfc6379a53786: alpha: fix usp value in multithreaded coredumps (2010-09-25 14:38:13 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/

[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] i915 regression fixes

2010-09-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Linus, a bit later than intended due to travel, but here a few more fixes for the recently reported regressions. The following changes since commit b30a3f6257ed2105259b404d419b4964e363928c: Linux 2.6.36-rc5 (2010-09-20 16:56:53 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kern

[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] i915 regression fixes

2010-09-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Linus, please pull from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ickle/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes which contains the following regression fixes: Chris Wilson (4): Revert "drm/i915: Enable RC6 on Ironlake." Revert "drm/i915: Allow LVDS on pipe A on gen4+" Revert "d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915

2010-09-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:00:28AM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > Chris, could you help to check my sandybridge fixes? One is address mask > fix found by Takashi, which should have been applied but I can't find it > anywhere upstream. And others are PTE cache control fixes. > > Please check 'for-ick

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915

2010-09-06 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:30:23 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: [...] > This batch of fixes include the timing fixes for the fallout from the > conversion of intel_wait_for_vblank() and the error checking for SDVO > modesetting. It also includes a [double dose] of module unload oopsen Thanks, this b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915

2010-09-06 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.09.06 09:30:23 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > in order to reduce the burden upon Eric and to try and feed patches > upstream in a more timely manner I volunteered to take over maintaining > the upstream i915 branches. > Chris, could you help to check my sandybridge fixes? One is address

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915

2010-09-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:27:34 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > Sadly, these still do not include a fix for the build failure¹ that > occurs if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set: > > , > | CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.o > | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c: In function > 'intel_overl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915

2010-09-06 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-09-06 10:30 +0200, Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi Linus, > > in order to reduce the burden upon Eric and to try and feed patches > upstream in a more timely manner I volunteered to take over maintaining > the upstream i915 branches. > > This batch of fixes include the timing fixes for the fallou

[Intel-gfx] [git pull] i915

2010-09-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Hi Linus, in order to reduce the burden upon Eric and to try and feed patches upstream in a more timely manner I volunteered to take over maintaining the upstream i915 branches. This batch of fixes include the timing fixes for the fallout from the conversion of intel_wait_for_vblank() and the err