On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:08:11AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > I have a slightly uneasy feeling about handing out drm_panel pointers
> > (both from here and of_drm_find_panel) without refcounting. If the panel
> > driver gets removed, whoeve
On 01/13/2015 12:08 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> I have a slightly uneasy feeling about handing out drm_panel pointers
>> (both from here and of_drm_find_panel) without refcounting. If the panel
>> driver gets removed, whoever called the find fun
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> I have a slightly uneasy feeling about handing out drm_panel pointers
> (both from here and of_drm_find_panel) without refcounting. If the panel
> driver gets removed, whoever called the find functions will have a
> dangling pointer. I supposed
On 1/9/2015 6:20 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
For scenarios where OF is not available, we can use panel identification by
name.
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 18 ++
include/drm/drm_panel.h | 3 +++
2
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> For scenarios where OF is not available, we can use panel identification by
> name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 18 ++
> include/drm/drm_panel.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+
For scenarios where OF is not available, we can use panel identification by
name.
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 18 ++
include/drm/drm_panel.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/
