Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Replace shmem memory region and object backend

On Fri, 27 May 2022 at 16:37, Adrian Larumbe wrote: > > On 18.05.2022 16:00, Matthew Auld wrote: > > On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 21:45, Adrian Larumbe > > wrote: > > > > > > This patch is a second attempt at eliminating the old shmem memory region > > > and GEM object backend, in favour of a TTM-based

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Replace shmem memory region and object backend

On 18.05.2022 16:00, Matthew Auld wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 21:45, Adrian Larumbe > wrote: > > > > This patch is a second attempt at eliminating the old shmem memory region > > and GEM object backend, in favour of a TTM-based one that is able to manage > > objects placed on both system and l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Replace shmem memory region and object backend

On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 21:45, Adrian Larumbe wrote: > > This patch is a second attempt at eliminating the old shmem memory region > and GEM object backend, in favour of a TTM-based one that is able to manage > objects placed on both system and local memory. > > Questions addressed since previous r

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Replace shmem memory region and object backend

This patch is a second attempt at eliminating the old shmem memory region and GEM object backend, in favour of a TTM-based one that is able to manage objects placed on both system and local memory. Questions addressed since previous revision: * Creating an anonymous vfs mount for shmem files in T