On 16/03/2022 14:39, Christian König wrote:
Am 16.03.22 um 15:26 schrieb Robert Beckett:
[SNIP]
this is where I replace an existing range check via drm_mm with the
range check I added in this patch.
Mhm, I still don't get the use case from the code, but I don't think it
matters any more.
On 16/03/2022 13:43, Christian König wrote:
Am 16.03.22 um 14:19 schrieb Robert Beckett:
On 16/03/2022 09:54, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.03.22 um 19:04 schrieb Robert Beckett:
RFC: do we want this to become a generic interface in
ttm_resource_manager_func?
RFC: would we prefer a differ
On 16/03/2022 09:54, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.03.22 um 19:04 schrieb Robert Beckett:
RFC: do we want this to become a generic interface in
ttm_resource_manager_func?
RFC: would we prefer a different interface? e.g.
for_each_resource_in_range or for_each_bo_in_range
Well completely NAK
RFC: do we want this to become a generic interface in
ttm_resource_manager_func?
RFC: would we prefer a different interface? e.g.
for_each_resource_in_range or for_each_bo_in_range
Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c | 21 +
include/drm/
