Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dsi: switch to drm_panel interface

2015-01-27 Thread Shobhit Kumar
On 01/23/2015 09:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:27:46PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: On 01/16/2015 05:57 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: @@ -881,13 +889,23 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev) drm_connector_register(connector); - fixed_mode = dsi->dev_ops

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dsi: switch to drm_panel interface

2015-01-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:27:46PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > On 01/16/2015 05:57 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > >@@ -881,13 +889,23 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev) > > > > drm_connector_register(connector); > > > >-fixed_mode = dsi->dev_ops->get_modes(&intel_dsi->dev); > >+

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dsi: switch to drm_panel interface

2015-01-23 Thread Shobhit Kumar
On 01/16/2015 05:57 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: Replace intel_dsi_device and intel_dsi_dev_ops with drm_panel and drm_panel_funcs. They are adequate for what we have now, and if we end up needing more than this we should improve drm_panel. This will keep us better aligned with the drm core infrastruct

[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dsi: switch to drm_panel interface

2015-01-16 Thread Jani Nikula
Replace intel_dsi_device and intel_dsi_dev_ops with drm_panel and drm_panel_funcs. They are adequate for what we have now, and if we end up needing more than this we should improve drm_panel. This will keep us better aligned with the drm core infrastructure. The panel driver initialization changes