On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:12:20 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:09:07PM +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > These patches are a heavily revised version of the patches I wrote over
> > a year ago. These patches have passed basic tests on SNB, and IVB, and
> > older versions worked
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:58:59 +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:21:42 +0100
> Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:04:14 +0100
> > Ben Widawsky wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:38 -0800
> > > Eric Anholt wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:09:07
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:21:42 +0100
Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:04:14 +0100
> Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:38 -0800
> > Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:09:07 +0100, Ben Widawsky
> > > wrote:
> > > > These patches are a heavily revis
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:04:14 +0100
Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:38 -0800
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:09:07 +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > These patches are a heavily revised version of the patches I wrote over
> > > a year ago. These patches have pass
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:33:38 -0800
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:09:07 +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > These patches are a heavily revised version of the patches I wrote over
> > a year ago. These patches have passed basic tests on SNB, and IVB, and
> > older versions worked on ILK.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:09:07PM +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> These patches are a heavily revised version of the patches I wrote over
> a year ago. These patches have passed basic tests on SNB, and IVB, and
> older versions worked on ILK. In theory, context support should work
> all the way back
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:09:07 +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> These patches are a heavily revised version of the patches I wrote over
> a year ago. These patches have passed basic tests on SNB, and IVB, and
> older versions worked on ILK. In theory, context support should work
> all the way back to G
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:17:57 -0500
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 2/14/12 4:09 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> > The IOCTLs defined here may also be used with ppgtt (real ppgtt) but the
> > interface may be insufficient for that. The contexts do provide a
> >
>
> A... what?
This was left up to the reade
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 21:17, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 2/14/12 4:09 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> The IOCTLs defined here may also be used with ppgtt (real ppgtt) but the
>> interface may be insufficient for that. The contexts do provide a
>>
>>
> A... what?
>
> Series looks reasonable to me. Th
On 2/14/12 4:09 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
The IOCTLs defined here may also be used with ppgtt (real ppgtt) but the
interface may be insufficient for that. The contexts do provide a
A... what?
Series looks reasonable to me. The one thing that makes me nervous is
4/11 mentioning the BIOS, whic
These patches are a heavily revised version of the patches I wrote over
a year ago. These patches have passed basic tests on SNB, and IVB, and
older versions worked on ILK. In theory, context support should work
all the way back to Gen4, but I haven't tested it. Also since I suspect
ILK may be uns
11 matches
Mail list logo
