On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:19:51PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2014/1/3 Jani Nikula :
> > With 20+ module parameters I think referring to them via a struct
> > improves clarity. The downsides are losing static on a couple of
> > variables and not having the initialization and module_param_named()
2014/1/3 Jani Nikula :
> With 20+ module parameters I think referring to them via a struct
> improves clarity. The downsides are losing static on a couple of
> variables and not having the initialization and module_param_named()
> right next to each other. On the other hand, all module parameters a
With 20+ module parameters I think referring to them via a struct
improves clarity. The downsides are losing static on a couple of
variables and not having the initialization and module_param_named()
right next to each other. On the other hand, all module parameters are
now defined in one place at
