On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> lgtm, but I think to make code extraction into new files really worth
>> it this should be followed up with a small patch to add an overview
>> DOC section and kerneldoc for the non-static functions
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> lgtm, but I think to make code extraction into new files really worth
> it this should be followed up with a small patch to add an overview
> DOC section and kerneldoc for the non-static functions. Plus pulling
> it all in at a neat place into our driver
lgtm, but I think to make code extraction into new files really worth
it this should be followed up with a small patch to add an overview
DOC section and kerneldoc for the non-static functions. Plus pulling
it all in at a neat place into our driver docs.
-Daniel
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Ja
2014-09-17 14:26 GMT-03:00 Jani Nikula :
> No functional changes.
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/24017/
But yeah, if you want to put more stuff there, intel_audio.c looks
like a better name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
>
> ---
>
> I was looking at the audio stuff in connection with s
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
I was looking at the audio stuff in connection with some bugs, and
thought the eld functions could use some love. But before proceeding, I
started wondering whether the audio functions would be better off in a
file of their own for starters,
