Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-07-26 11:34:49)
>
> On 20/07/2017 10:03, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On 19/07/2017 13:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-07-18 15:36:04)
> >>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> >>>
> >>> Rough sketch of the idea I mentioned a few times to various people -
>
On 20/07/2017 10:03, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 19/07/2017 13:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-07-18 15:36:04)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Rough sketch of the idea I mentioned a few times to various people -
merging
the engine busyness tracking with Chris i915 PMU RFC.
First pa
On 19/07/2017 13:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-07-18 15:36:04)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Rough sketch of the idea I mentioned a few times to various people - merging
the engine busyness tracking with Chris i915 PMU RFC.
First patch is the actual PMU RFC by Chris. It is foll
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-07-18 15:36:04)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Rough sketch of the idea I mentioned a few times to various people - merging
> the engine busyness tracking with Chris i915 PMU RFC.
>
> First patch is the actual PMU RFC by Chris. It is followed by some cleanup
> patches, t
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Rough sketch of the idea I mentioned a few times to various people - merging
the engine busyness tracking with Chris i915 PMU RFC.
First patch is the actual PMU RFC by Chris. It is followed by some cleanup
patches, then come a few improvements, cheap execlists engine busynes
