On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:19:29AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 09/04/16 09:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:54:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> >>
> >>Retired request queue coupled with retired work handler is a scalability
> >>concern on s
On 09/04/16 09:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:54:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Retired request queue coupled with retired work handler is a scalability
concern on some workloads of which one dramatic example is gem_close_race.
This series depend o
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:54:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Retired request queue coupled with retired work handler is a scalability
> concern on some workloads of which one dramatic example is gem_close_race.
>
> This series depend on i915_gem_object_pin_map serie
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Retired request queue coupled with retired work handler is a scalability
concern on some workloads of which one dramatic example is gem_close_race.
This series depend on i915_gem_object_pin_map series by Chris Wilson.
Brief outline of patches:
1/4) Allow lockless request
