Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/2] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2014-05-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 04:48:23PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > From: Akash Goel > > We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex' > is locked. Execbuffer ioctl is one place where it is generally held > for the longest time. And sometimes because of this occasional

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/2] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2014-05-04 Thread Goel, Akash
, 2014 5:12 PM To: Goel, Akash Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Gupta, Sourab Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/2] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 04:48:23PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > From: Akash Goel > > We are trying to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/2] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2014-05-04 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 04:48:23PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > From: Akash Goel > > We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex' > is locked. Execbuffer ioctl is one place where it is generally held > for the longest time. And sometimes because of this occasional

[Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/2] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2014-05-04 Thread akash . goel
From: Akash Goel We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex' is locked. Execbuffer ioctl is one place where it is generally held for the longest time. And sometimes because of this occasional glitches/flickers are being observed in 60 fps playback (due to miss of V-blank