Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-12 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 04:28:17PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:19:40 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Non-text part: multipart/mixed > Non-text part: multipart/signed > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:56:21PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:19:40 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:56:21PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > These are dirty hacks just to enable testi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:56:21PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking > > maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot > > this down before I waste

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-11 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:47:24 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking > maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot > this down before I waste more time :). What's the planned usage? -- keith.pack...@intel.com

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] non-blocking map

2011-08-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
These are dirty hacks just to enable testing write only non-blocking maps. I haven't yet created a good test, but maybe someone can shoot this down before I waste more time :). Ben ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://list