Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> The property-based design precludes optimal use of current open-source >>> userspace. >> I don’t see how it even effects open-source userspace. It can just ignore it >> entirely. > > i.e. this property is useless for open-source userspace,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-25 Thread Daniel Stone
Stone [mailto:dan...@fooishbar.org] > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 6:37 PM > To: Smith, Gary K > Cc: Jesse Barnes ; Daniel Vetter ; > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Thierry Reding > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for > Gen9 an

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-25 Thread Smith, Gary K
Cc: Jesse Barnes ; Daniel Vetter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above Hi, On 25 January 2016 at 18:15, Smith, Gary K wrote: > I really do not understand what the issue is here. It’s a hi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-25 Thread Smith, Gary K
-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above Hi, On 25 January 2016 at 18:15, Smith, Gary K wrote: > I really do not understand what the issue is here. It’s a hint provided by > the user to indicat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-25 Thread Daniel Stone
; Thanks > Gary > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org] > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 5:39 PM > To: Daniel Stone ; Daniel Vetter > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Thierry Reding > ; Smith, Gary K > Subjec

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-25 Thread Smith, Gary K
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above On 01/19/2016 02:28 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: >>>> >> > We aren't just talking about a few fbs here, we already see >>>> >> > more than >>>> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-25 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 01/19/2016 02:28 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> > We aren't just talking about a few fbs here, we already see more than >> > 100 fbs active during complex situations. Potentially doubling this >> > number is surely a significant increase in memory usage, both from the >> > manage

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 10 September 2015 at 16:02, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:04:23AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On 09/09/2015 09:36 AM, Smith, Gary K wrote: >> > I don't understand why this is an issue. Surely the fb is to describe >> > static state about the buffer, not dynamic state.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:04:23AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > [Adding Rob & Thierry] > > On 09/09/2015 09:36 AM, Smith, Gary K wrote: > > I don't understand why this is an issue. Surely the fb is to describe > > static state about the buffer, not dynamic state. The fb should be > > created with

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
anks > Gary > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 4:25 PM > To: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Kannan, Vandana; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Smith, Gary K > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-09 Thread Smith, Gary K
y K Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above On 09/09/2015 08:23 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:07:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On 09/07/2015 09:35 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:12

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 09/09/2015 08:23 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:07:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On 09/07/2015 09:35 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:12:50AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: This patch includes enabling render decompression after checking all

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:07:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On 09/07/2015 09:35 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:12:50AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > >> This patch includes enabling render decompression after checking all the > >> requirements (format, tiling, rotation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-08 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 09/07/2015 09:35 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:12:50AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: >> This patch includes enabling render decompression after checking all the >> requirements (format, tiling, rotation etc.). Along with this, the WAs >> mentioned in BSpec Workaround page

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 01:12:50AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > This patch includes enabling render decompression after checking all the > requirements (format, tiling, rotation etc.). Along with this, the WAs > mentioned in BSpec Workaround page have been implemented. > > This patch has been im

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915: Render decompression support for Gen9 and above

2015-09-04 Thread Vandana Kannan
This patch includes enabling render decompression after checking all the requirements (format, tiling, rotation etc.). Along with this, the WAs mentioned in BSpec Workaround page have been implemented. This patch has been implemented on top of Nabendu/Chandra's NV12 patches. TODO: 1. Disable ster