On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Dave Gordon wrote:
> For this reason, I'd like to recommend that anyone doing this sort of
> bulk transformation with Cocci or awk or just sed should /always/
> include the transformation script to help those with patches in flight.
I think that's generally the expectation
On 08/04/16 07:09, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On to, 2016-04-07 at 18:57 +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
Where we have a suitable dev_priv pointer, we can use that rather than
'dev' for accessing INTEL_INFO(). This removes one level of memory
reference, decreasing code size a little and possibly making e
On to, 2016-04-07 at 18:57 +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> Where we have a suitable dev_priv pointer, we can use that rather than
> 'dev' for accessing INTEL_INFO(). This removes one level of memory
> reference, decreasing code size a little and possibly making everything
> a little faster. We could a
Where we have a suitable dev_priv pointer, we can use that rather than
'dev' for accessing INTEL_INFO(). This removes one level of memory
reference, decreasing code size a little and possibly making everything
a little faster. We could also do this for all the macros that implicitly
use INTEL_INFO
