Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] Page table sharing and bufferless execbuf

2015-09-26 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 09:58 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > I've been carrying something looking rougly like this patchset around > internally for a long time now, and with SKL out there now, I figured > it's time to get it posted and start the process of integration. > > David is working on pulling

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] Page table sharing and bufferless execbuf

2015-09-04 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 09/04/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:58:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> A few things to think about: >> - how to signal GPU hangs with the new execbuf (a signal might be more >> natural as the execution appears more CPU-like? what state do we >> hav

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] Page table sharing and bufferless execbuf

2015-09-04 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:58:54AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > A few things to think about: > - how to signal GPU hangs with the new execbuf (a signal might be more > natural as the execution appears more CPU-like? what state do we > have to worry about restoring for bufferless contexts

[Intel-gfx] [RFC] Page table sharing and bufferless execbuf

2015-09-04 Thread Jesse Barnes
I've been carrying something looking rougly like this patchset around internally for a long time now, and with SKL out there now, I figured it's time to get it posted and start the process of integration. David is working on pulling over most of the "driver based PASID handling" and other code int