Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC/Draft] Testing requirements for upstream drm/i915 patches

2013-11-13 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
I'm in favor of all Daniel said and my 2 cents here is just to highlight how easy and straightforward is to create an intel-gpu-tools testcase nowadays. If you know very well the feature you are implementing you will spend couple of hours or 1 day maximum. I agree with Daniel that it is difficult

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC/Draft] Testing requirements for upstream drm/i915 patches

2013-10-30 Thread Chad Versace
On 10/30/2013 12:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: test coverage of the existing code _before_ starting a feature instead of when the patches are ready for merging should help a lot, before everyone is invested into patches already and mou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC/Draft] Testing requirements for upstream drm/i915 patches

2013-10-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: >> test coverage of the existing code _before_ starting a feature instead >> of when the patches are ready for merging should help a lot, before >> everyone is invested into patches already and mounting rebase pain looms >> large. > > Th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC/Draft] Testing requirements for upstream drm/i915 patches

2013-10-30 Thread Ian Romanick
On 10/30/2013 09:00 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > [This is cross-posted to the public intel-gfx mailing list at > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-October/035268.html > I'll also present a quick overview of this at Gavin's kernel PDT next > week.] > > Hi all, > > So in the past h

[Intel-gfx] [RFC/Draft] Testing requirements for upstream drm/i915 patches

2013-10-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
[This is cross-posted to the public intel-gfx mailing list at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-October/035268.html I'll also present a quick overview of this at Gavin's kernel PDT next week.] Hi all, So in the past half year we've had tons of sometimes rather heated discus