Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-30 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-04-27 12:20:55) > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will > > stall otherwise? > > Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch. > > I opted to drop the Cc: stable for now. This does

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will > stall otherwise? Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch. I opted to drop the Cc: stable for now. This doesn't mean it can't be backported later on, I'm just punti

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-25 Thread Ian W MORRISON
Hi Anusha, Can I ask if this is on anyone's radar as I'm concerned this patch will stall otherwise? I see that the significance of testing with the 4.14 kernel enabled the firmware to be included in the latest Chrome OS kernel ( https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-os-r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-21 Thread Ian W MORRISON
On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis wrote: > Hi all: > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest > drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we > could declare this FW as acceptable and healthy to be used with kernel >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-20 Thread Botello Ortega, Luis
Hi all: We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we could declare this FW as acceptable and healthy to be used with kernel version 4.14 . However, we cannot guarantee quality and healthy o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-20 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
>-Original Message- >From: Vivi, Rodrigo >Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 11:04 AM >To: Jani Nikula >Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha ; Ian W MORRISON >; airl...@linux.ie; Greg KH >; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux- >ker...@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; dri- >de...@lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:02:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" wrote: > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM > >>To: Ian W MORRISON > >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo ; Srivat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-20 Thread Ian W MORRISON
On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: > > What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? > > BR, > Jani. I did some basic testing including running a 4K vide

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-19 Thread Ian W MORRISON
On 18 April 2018 at 00:14, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-04-17 12:02:52) >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" wrote: >> >>-Original Message- >> >>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] >> >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM >> >>To: Ian W M

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-17 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-04-17 12:02:52) > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" wrote: > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM > >>To: Ian W MORRISON > >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo ; Srivatsa, Anusha > >>; Wa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-17 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM >>To: Ian W MORRISON >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo ; Srivatsa, Anusha >>; Wajdeczko, Michal >>; Greg KH ; >>airl...@linux.ie; joonas

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-16 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
>-Original Message- >From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM >To: Ian W MORRISON >Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo ; Srivatsa, Anusha >; Wajdeczko, Michal >; Greg KH ; >airl...@linux.ie; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; >linux-ker...@vger.kernel.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-11 Thread Ian W MORRISON
On 11 April 2018 at 22:27, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> >> >>> >>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >>> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >>> >> >> I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > >> >> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >> > > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and > v4.15 kernels which I have test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-11 Thread Ian W MORRISON
> > NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older > kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier kernels didn't s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, ianwmorri...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ian W MORRISON > > As the Geminilake firmware is now merged to linux-firmware.git > use MODUE_FIRMWARE to load the firmware. > > This removes the error message in the dmesg log: > > i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for >

[Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

2018-04-11 Thread ianwmorrison
From: Ian W MORRISON As the Geminilake firmware is now merged to linux-firmware.git use MODUE_FIRMWARE to load the firmware. This removes the error message in the dmesg log: i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/glk_dmc_ver1_04.bin failed with error -2 i915 :00: