Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-29 Thread Lyude Paul
JFYI - the wrapping was because of evolution, sorry about that. Going to make sure that gets fixed the next time I have to send out a topic branch On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 13:35 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2021, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > topi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-29 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Lyude Paul wrote: >> topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst-2021-10-27: >> UAPI Changes: >> Nope! >> >> Cross-subsystem Changes: >> drm_dp_update_payload_part1() takes a new argument for specifying what the >> VCPI slot start is >> >> Core Changes: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-29 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Lyude Paul wrote: > topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst-2021-10-27: > UAPI Changes: > Nope! > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > drm_dp_update_payload_part1() takes a new argument for specifying what the > VCPI slot start is > > Core Changes: > Make the DP MST helpers aware of the current starti

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-27 Thread Lyude Paul
topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst-2021-10-27: UAPI Changes: Nope! Cross-subsystem Changes: drm_dp_update_payload_part1() takes a new argument for specifying what the VCPI slot start is Core Changes: Make the DP MST helpers aware of the current starting VCPI slot/VCPI total slot count... Driver Changes: ...

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-27 Thread Lyude Paul
This was for airlied to pull into drm-next On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 09:18 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Lyude, > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:30:14PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst-2021-10-25: > > UAPI Changes: > > Nope! > > > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > > drm_dp_update_pay

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-27 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Lyude, On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:30:14PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst-2021-10-25: > UAPI Changes: > Nope! > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > drm_dp_update_payload_part1() takes a new argument for specifying what the > VCPI slot start is > > Core Changes: > Make the DP MST he

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst

2021-10-25 Thread Lyude Paul
topic/amdgpu-dp2.0-mst-2021-10-25: UAPI Changes: Nope! Cross-subsystem Changes: drm_dp_update_payload_part1() takes a new argument for specifying what the VCPI slot start is Core Changes: Make the DP MST helpers aware of the current starting VCPI slot/VCPI total slot count... Driver Changes: ...

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-dp-training-delay-helpers for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next

2021-10-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:59:57PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Hi all - >> >> These are the drm dp helpers for figuring out link training delays, to >> be pulled to both drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next. >> >> >> topic/drm-dp-training-delay-helpe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-dp-training-delay-helpers for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next

2021-10-19 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:59:57PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi all - > > These are the drm dp helpers for figuring out link training delays, to > be pulled to both drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next. > > > topic/drm-dp-training-delay-helpers-2021-10-19: > Core Changes: > - drm dp helpers for

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-dp-training-delay-helpers for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next

2021-10-19 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi all - These are the drm dp helpers for figuring out link training delays, to be pulled to both drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next. topic/drm-dp-training-delay-helpers-2021-10-19: Core Changes: - drm dp helpers for figuring out link training delays BR, Jani. The following changes since commi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-18 Thread Dave Airlie
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 19:37, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 14:13:02) > > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) > > > Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) > > > > Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. > > > > > > > > topic/i915-tt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-14 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 14:13:02) > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) > > Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) > > > Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. > > > > > > topic/i915-ttm-2021-06-11: > > > drm-misc and drm-intel pull request for topic/i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-14 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 14.06.21 um 08:46 schrieb Joonas Lahtinen: Quoting Thomas Zimmermann (2021-06-13 21:54:03) Hi Joonas Am 11.06.21 um 13:13 schrieb Joonas Lahtinen: Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-13 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Thomas Zimmermann (2021-06-13 21:54:03) > Hi Joonas > > Am 11.06.21 um 13:13 schrieb Joonas Lahtinen: > > Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) > >> Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) > >>> Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. > >>> > >>> topic/i915-tt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-13 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Joonas Am 11.06.21 um 13:13 schrieb Joonas Lahtinen: Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. topic/i915-ttm-2021-06-11: drm-misc and drm-intel pull request for topic/i915-ttm: - Conv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-11 Thread Intel
On 6/11/21 1:13 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. topic/i915-ttm-2021-06-11: drm-misc and drm-intel pull request for topic/i915-ttm: - Convert i915 lme

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-11 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2021-06-11 13:40:56) > Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) > > Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. > > > > topic/i915-ttm-2021-06-11: > > drm-misc and drm-intel pull request for topic/i915-ttm: > > - Convert i915 lmem handling to ttm. > > - Ad

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-11 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2021-06-11 12:27:15) > Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. > > topic/i915-ttm-2021-06-11: > drm-misc and drm-intel pull request for topic/i915-ttm: > - Convert i915 lmem handling to ttm. > - Add a patch to temporarily add a driver_private member to vma_

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-ttm

2021-06-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Pull request for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-gt-next. topic/i915-ttm-2021-06-11: drm-misc and drm-intel pull request for topic/i915-ttm: - Convert i915 lmem handling to ttm. - Add a patch to temporarily add a driver_private member to vma_node. - Use this to allow mixed object mmap handling for i91

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/intel-gen-to-ver -> drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next

2021-04-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:47:36PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2021-04-19 12:53:11) > > > > Hi Joonas and Rodrigo - > > > > Here's the gen to ver conversion topic branch to be merged to both > > drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. > > Pulled. Pulled, thanks. (Sorry fo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/intel-gen-to-ver -> drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next

2021-04-20 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2021-04-19 12:53:11) > > Hi Joonas and Rodrigo - > > Here's the gen to ver conversion topic branch to be merged to both > drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. Pulled. Regards, Joonas > Lots of Cc's for heads up. > > > BR, > Jani. > > > topic/intel-gen-to-ver-2021-04-1

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/intel-gen-to-ver -> drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next

2021-04-19 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Joonas and Rodrigo - Here's the gen to ver conversion topic branch to be merged to both drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. Lots of Cc's for heads up. BR, Jani. topic/intel-gen-to-ver-2021-04-19: Gen to ver conversions across the driver The main change is Lucas' series [1], with Ville'

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-gem-next

2021-03-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:31 PM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > The rough plan we discussed somewhat ad-hoc with Jani&Rodrigo (Joonas was > > out this week, but back next) is that they send out a pull with what's > > there right now. Then once both this branch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-gem-next

2021-03-26 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > The rough plan we discussed somewhat ad-hoc with Jani&Rodrigo (Joonas was > out this week, but back next) is that they send out a pull with what's > there right now. Then once both this branch here and the -gt-next pull are > in drm-next they will backme

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-gem-next

2021-03-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, topic/i915-gem-next-2021-03-26: special i915-gem-next pull as requested - Conversion to dma_resv_locking, obj->mm.lock is gone (Maarten, with help from Thomas Hellström) - watchdog (Tvrtko, one patch to cancel individual request from Chris) - legacy ioctl cleanup (Jason+Ashutosh) - i91

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/adl-s-enabling into drm-intel-next

2021-02-02 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2021-02-02 13:19:13) > On Mon, 01 Feb 2021, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > Hi Rodrigo/Jani, > > > > Here are the changes to add basic Alder Lake S support in the driver, with > > patches touching both generic parts, gt and display. Remaining changes don't > > need a topic branch a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-device-pdev

2021-02-02 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2021-02-02 14:37:00) > > Hi Joonas - > > This is Thomas's drm_device.pdev removal for i915, the first three > patches from [1]. Let's merge to both drm-intel-next and > drm-intel-gt-next. This is now merged. Regards, Joonas > Zhenyu & Zhi, FYI, this touches gvt too, and it

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-device-pdev

2021-02-02 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Joonas - This is Thomas's drm_device.pdev removal for i915, the first three patches from [1]. Let's merge to both drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. Zhenyu & Zhi, FYI, this touches gvt too, and it was getting a bit too complicated to handle all the components separately. Hopefully you won

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/adl-s-enabling into drm-intel-next

2021-02-02 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 01 Feb 2021, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Hi Rodrigo/Jani, > > Here are the changes to add basic Alder Lake S support in the driver, with > patches touching both generic parts, gt and display. Remaining changes don't > need a topic branch anymore and can be applied individually to each branch.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/adl-s-enabling into drm-intel-gt-next

2021-02-01 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi Joonas, Here are the changes to add basic Alder Lake S support in the driver, with patches touching both generic parts, gt and display. Remaining changes don't need a topic branch anymore and can be applied individually to each branch. thanks Lucas De Marchi *** topic/adl-s-enabling-2021-02-

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/adl-s-enabling into drm-intel-next

2021-02-01 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi Rodrigo/Jani, Here are the changes to add basic Alder Lake S support in the driver, with patches touching both generic parts, gt and display. Remaining changes don't need a topic branch anymore and can be applied individually to each branch. thanks Lucas De Marchi *** topic/adl-s-enabling-20

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/dp-hdmi-2.1-pcon for drm-misc-next

2021-01-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 07 Jan 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:14:58AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Hi Maarten, Maxime, and Thomas - >> >> Here's the DP-HDMI2.1 PCON support topic pull consisting of the series >> [1]. The series is split roughly 50-50 between drm helpers and i915, so

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/dp-hdmi-2.1-pcon for drm-misc-next

2021-01-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:14:58AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Maarten, Maxime, and Thomas - > > Here's the DP-HDMI2.1 PCON support topic pull consisting of the series > [1]. The series is split roughly 50-50 between drm helpers and i915, so > a topic branch seemed to be the right way to go.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/dp-hdmi-2.1-pcon for drm-misc-next

2020-12-23 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Maarten, Maxime, and Thomas - Here's the DP-HDMI2.1 PCON support topic pull consisting of the series [1]. The series is split roughly 50-50 between drm helpers and i915, so a topic branch seemed to be the right way to go. I'll also pull this to drm-intel-next once you've merged to drm-misc-n

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock

2020-11-07 Thread Wang, Zhi A
: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:55 PM To: Wang, Zhi A ; Joonas Lahtinen ; Nikula, Jani ; intel-gfx ; Yuan, Hang ; Lv, Zhiyuan ; intel-gvt-dev Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock Hey, Op 22-09-2020 om 13:51 schreef Wang, Zhi A: > > Hi, > > Here's the patch which

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock

2020-09-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, Op 22-09-2020 om 13:51 schreef Wang, Zhi A: > > Hi, > > Here's the patch which introduces GVT-g ww lock support against > drm-intel-gt-next branch. > > Thanks > > -- > > The following changes since commit 4316b19dee27cc5cd34a95fdbc0a3a5237507701: > >   drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable i

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/gvt-ww-lock

2020-09-22 Thread Wang, Zhi A
Hi, Here's the patch which introduces GVT-g ww lock support against drm-intel-gt-next branch. Thanks -- The following changes since commit 4316b19dee27cc5cd34a95fdbc0a3a5237507701:   drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in intel_context_create_request. (2020-09-21 11:09:46 +0200) are av

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/nouveau-i915-dp-helpers-and-cleanup

2020-09-04 Thread Lyude Paul
On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 09:24 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 07:38:57PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > topic/nouveau-i915-dp-helpers-and-cleanup-2020-08-31-1: > > UAPI Changes: > > > > None > > > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > > > > * Moves a bunch of miscellaneous DP code from t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/nouveau-i915-dp-helpers-and-cleanup

2020-09-04 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 07:38:57PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > topic/nouveau-i915-dp-helpers-and-cleanup-2020-08-31-1: > UAPI Changes: > > None > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > > * Moves a bunch of miscellaneous DP code from the i915 driver into a set > of shared DRM DP helpers > > Core Changes:

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/nouveau-i915-dp-helpers-and-cleanup

2020-08-31 Thread Lyude Paul
topic/nouveau-i915-dp-helpers-and-cleanup-2020-08-31-1: UAPI Changes: None Cross-subsystem Changes: * Moves a bunch of miscellaneous DP code from the i915 driver into a set of shared DRM DP helpers Core Changes: * New DRM DP helpers (see above) Driver Changes: * Implements usage of the afo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/phy-compliance

2020-04-17 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Merged into drm-misc-next Am 08.04.20 um 14:49 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Hey, > > Here's a pull request to pull in the DP PHY Compliance series. > It's based on top of drm/drm-next, and contains all patches for core, amd and > i915. :) > > Cheers, > Maarten > > topic/phy-compliance-2020-04-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/phy-compliance

2020-04-16 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-04-15 10:48:15) > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:40 AM Jani Nikula > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Maarten Lankhorst > >> wrote: > >> > Hey, > >> > > >> > Here's a pull request to pull in the DP PHY Compliance series.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/phy-compliance

2020-04-15 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:40 AM Jani Nikula > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Maarten Lankhorst >> wrote: >> > Hey, >> > >> > Here's a pull request to pull in the DP PHY Compliance series. >> > It's based on top of drm/drm-next, and contains all pa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/phy-compliance

2020-04-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:40 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Maarten Lankhorst > wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Here's a pull request to pull in the DP PHY Compliance series. > > It's based on top of drm/drm-next, and contains all patches for core, amd > > and i915. :) > > Ping, I don't

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/phy-compliance

2020-04-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Here's a pull request to pull in the DP PHY Compliance series. > It's based on top of drm/drm-next, and contains all patches for core, amd and > i915. :) Ping, I don't see this merged in any tree yet. BR, Jani. > > Cheers, > Maarten >

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/phy-compliance

2020-04-08 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, Here's a pull request to pull in the DP PHY Compliance series. It's based on top of drm/drm-next, and contains all patches for core, amd and i915. :) Cheers, Maarten topic/phy-compliance-2020-04-08: Topic pull request for topic/phy-compliance: - Standardize DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN name. - Add

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mst-bw-check-fixes-for-airlied

2020-03-12 Thread Lyude Paul
topic/mst-bw-check-fixes-for-airlied-2020-03-12-2: UAPI Changes: None Cross-subsystem Changes: None Core Changes: Fixed regressions introduced by commit cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check"), which would cause us to: * Calculate the available bandwidth

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-warn for drm-misc-next

2020-01-23 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 05:25:40PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Maarten/Maxime, > > Please pull the drm_device based drm_WARN* macros from the topic > branch. I'll pull the same to drm-intel-next-queued. > > I like to use the topic branch here, because due to timing it'll take > forever for the

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-warn for drm-misc-next

2020-01-22 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Maarten/Maxime, Please pull the drm_device based drm_WARN* macros from the topic branch. I'll pull the same to drm-intel-next-queued. I like to use the topic branch here, because due to timing it'll take forever for the full feature route through drm-next and backmerges. The baseline was ch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-mipi-dsi-dsc-updates

2019-11-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 14-11-2019 om 15:35 schreef Jani Nikula: >> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> Hi Sean, Maarten and Maxime - >>> >>> Here's the topic branch about DSI changes as I wrote in [1]. Once you've >>> pulled this in drm-misc, I'll follow suit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-mipi-dsi-dsc-updates

2019-11-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 14-11-2019 om 15:35 schreef Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Hi Sean, Maarten and Maxime - >> >> Here's the topic branch about DSI changes as I wrote in [1]. Once you've >> pulled this in drm-misc, I'll follow suit in i915. > Ping. > > FWIW Daniel acked the approach on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-mipi-dsi-dsc-updates

2019-11-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Jani Nikula wrote: > Hi Sean, Maarten and Maxime - > > Here's the topic branch about DSI changes as I wrote in [1]. Once you've > pulled this in drm-misc, I'll follow suit in i915. Ping. FWIW Daniel acked the approach on IRC. BR, Jani. > > > Thanks, > Jani. > > [1] http:/

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drm-mipi-dsi-dsc-updates

2019-11-11 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Sean, Maarten and Maxime - Here's the topic branch about DSI changes as I wrote in [1]. Once you've pulled this in drm-misc, I'll follow suit in i915. Thanks, Jani. [1] http://marc.info/?i=87sgmz6cw0@intel.com topic/drm-mipi-dsi-dsc-updates-2019-11-11: Core Changes: - Update DSI data

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2

2019-10-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Lyude Paul wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 10:21 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:06 PM Lyude Paul wrote: > > > topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2: > > > UAPI Changes: > > > > > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > > > > > > Core Chang

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2

2019-10-30 Thread Lyude Paul
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 10:21 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:06 PM Lyude Paul wrote: > > topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2: > > UAPI Changes: > > > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > > > > Core Changes: > > * Handle UP requests asynchronously in the DP MST helpers,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2

2019-10-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:06 PM Lyude Paul wrote: > > topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2: > UAPI Changes: > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > > Core Changes: > * Handle UP requests asynchronously in the DP MST helpers, fixing > hotplug notifications and allowing us to implement suspend/re

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2

2019-10-29 Thread Lyude Paul
topic/mst-suspend-resume-reprobe-2019-10-29-2: UAPI Changes: Cross-subsystem Changes: Core Changes: * Handle UP requests asynchronously in the DP MST helpers, fixing hotplug notifications and allowing us to implement suspend/resume reprobing * Add basic suspend/resume reprobing to the DP MST

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3, fixes

2019-06-26 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 26-06-2019 om 12:03 schreef Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: > Hi, > > On 6/26/19 10:48 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is the followup pull request for the remove-fbcon-notifiers topic >> branch. >> No major changes, just a few compile fixes. >> >> This will be pulled into drm-mis

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3, fixes

2019-06-26 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On 6/26/19 10:48 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hi all, > > This is the followup pull request for the remove-fbcon-notifiers topic branch. > No major changes, just a few compile fixes. > > This will be pulled into drm-misc-next, but it might be useful for the fbdev > and backlight trees to

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3, fixes

2019-06-26 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi all, This is the followup pull request for the remove-fbcon-notifiers topic branch. No major changes, just a few compile fixes. This will be pulled into drm-misc-next, but it might be useful for the fbdev and backlight trees too. Cheers, Maarten topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers-2019-06-26: - Ex

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-19 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On 6/18/19 1:46 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 18-06-2019 om 13:17 schreef Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: >> Hi, >> >> On 6/18/19 11:20 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>> Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: Hi all, As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 18-06-2019 om 13:17 schreef Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: > Hi, > > On 6/18/19 11:20 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork here as drm-misc >>> maintainer. >>> >>> This is the t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > > Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paper

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, On 6/18/19 11:20 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork here as drm-misc >> maintainer. >> >> This is the topic pull request for the fbdev notifier removal. >> >> Bar, please m

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork here as drm-misc > > > maintainer. > > > > > > This

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: > > Hi all, > > > > As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork here as drm-misc > > maintainer. > > > > This is the topic pull request for the fbdev notifier removal. > > > > Bar, pleas

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-18 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 14-06-2019 om 11:25 schreef Maarten Lankhorst: > Hi all, > > As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork here as drm-misc > maintainer. > > This is the topic pull request for the fbdev notifier removal. > > Bar, please make a final check and pull into your fbdev tree. > > Lee, plea

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/remove-fbcon-notifiers for v5.3

2019-06-14 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi all, As discussed with Daniel V, I'm just doing the paperwork here as drm-misc maintainer. This is the topic pull request for the fbdev notifier removal. Bar, please make a final check and pull into your fbdev tree. Lee, please make a final check and pull into your backlight tree. Greg, th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-18 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2019-03-13 13:21:46) > Hey Sean and Joonas, > > One more pull request for the hdr-formats topic branch. FP16 support > is now also implemented. > > Can this be pulled to drm-misc-next and dinq? Pulled to drm-intel-next-queued. Regards, Joonas > > ~Maarten > > topic

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-13 Thread Sean Paul
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey Sean and Joonas, > > One more pull request for the hdr-formats topic branch. FP16 support > is now also implemented. > > Can this be pulled to drm-misc-next and dinq? Merged in drm-misc-next. Sean > > ~Maarten > > topic

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-13 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey Sean and Joonas, One more pull request for the hdr-formats topic branch. FP16 support is now also implemented. Can this be pulled to drm-misc-next and dinq? ~Maarten topic/hdr-formats-2019-03-13: Add support for floating point half-width formats. The following changes since commit 296e9b19e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:52:13PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 12:19 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Op 07-03-2019 om 18:12 schreef Adam Jackson: > > > On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 10:48 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > > Hi Sean and Joonas, > > > > > > > > H

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-11 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 12:19 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 07-03-2019 om 18:12 schreef Adam Jackson: > > On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 10:48 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > Hi Sean and Joonas, > > > > > > Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 11-03-2019 om 12:57 schreef Joonas Lahtinen: > Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2019-03-07 11:48:24) >> Hi Sean and Joonas, >> >> Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to >> drm-misc-next and dinq? > I was travelling on Fri, so sorry for delay. This is now pulled t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-11 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2019-03-07 11:48:24) > Hi Sean and Joonas, > > Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to > drm-misc-next and dinq? I was travelling on Fri, so sorry for delay. This is now pulled to dinq, too. Regards, Joonas > > Cheers, > Maarten

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, Op 07-03-2019 om 18:12 schreef Adam Jackson: > On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 10:48 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Hi Sean and Joonas, >> >> Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to >> drm-misc-next and dinq? > Could you also add Kevin Strasser's patch for FP16

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-08 Thread Sean Paul
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:48:24AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hi Sean and Joonas, > > Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to > drm-misc-next and dinq? > Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks for sending this out. Sean > Cheers, > Maarten > > topic/hdr-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-08 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 07-03-2019 om 18:46 schreef Sean Paul: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:48:24AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Hi Sean and Joonas, >> >> Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to >> drm-misc-next and dinq? >> >> Cheers, >> Maarten >> >> topic/hdr-formats-2019-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-07 Thread Sean Paul
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:48:24AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hi Sean and Joonas, > > Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to > drm-misc-next and dinq? > > Cheers, > Maarten > > topic/hdr-formats-2019-03-07: Mentioned on IRC, but will do so here as w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-07 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 10:48 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hi Sean and Joonas, > > Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to > drm-misc-next and dinq? Could you also add Kevin Strasser's patch for FP16 formats? For that matter I'd like to see FP32 added too,

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/hdr-formats

2019-03-07 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi Sean and Joonas, Here's a pull request for HDR format enabling in i915. Can this be pulled to drm-misc-next and dinq? Cheers, Maarten topic/hdr-formats-2019-03-07: Add support for Y21x and Y41x to drm core and i915, and P01x support to i915. The following changes since commit 4b057e73f28f1df

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mei-hdcp for char-misc-next

2019-02-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:00 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi Greg&Arnd > > > > topic/mei-hdcp-2019-02-26: > > mei-hdcp driver > > > > mei driver for the me hdcp client, for use by drm/i915. > > > > Including the following prep work: > > -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mei-hdcp for char-misc-next

2019-02-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Greg&Arnd > > topic/mei-hdcp-2019-02-26: > mei-hdcp driver > > mei driver for the me hdcp client, for use by drm/i915. > > Including the following prep work: > - whitelist hdcp client in mei bus > - merge to include char-misc-ne

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mei-hdcp for char-misc-next

2019-02-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Greg&Arnd topic/mei-hdcp-2019-02-26: mei-hdcp driver mei driver for the me hdcp client, for use by drm/i915. Including the following prep work: - whitelist hdcp client in mei bus - merge to include char-misc-next because of another mei bus prep patch to export a helper macro to drivers - dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mei-hdcp

2019-02-20 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2019-02-19 09:55:27) > Hi all, > > topic/mei-hdcp-2019-02-19: > Prep patches + headers for the mei-hdcp/i915 component interfaces > > Also contains the prep work in the component helpers plus adjustements > for the snd-hda/i915 component interface. > > Plus one small stati

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mei-hdcp

2019-02-19 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:55:27AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > topic/mei-hdcp-2019-02-19: > Prep patches + headers for the mei-hdcp/i915 component interfaces > > Also contains the prep work in the component helpers plus adjustements > for the snd-hda/i915 component interface. > > P

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/mei-hdcp

2019-02-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, topic/mei-hdcp-2019-02-19: Prep patches + headers for the mei-hdcp/i915 component interfaces Also contains the prep work in the component helpers plus adjustements for the snd-hda/i915 component interface. Plus one small static inline in the drm_hdcp.h header that both i915 and mei_hdcp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-13 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-02-12 01:51:18) > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from > > Ram. > > I'm about to handle dinq to Jo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-12 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from > Ram. I'm about to handle dinq to Joonas since I did latest pull-request for 5.1 last week. Also

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-12 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from > Ram. > > drm-misc maintainers: Please pull, there's a drm doc patch follow-up > that I want to s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:57 PM Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:25:12 +0100, > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Hi Daniel. > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > > > > > drm-intel maint

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-11 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:18:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:57 PM Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:25:12 +0100, > > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > Hi Daniel. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > Hi all,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-11 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:25:12 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Daniel. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from > > Ram. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:25 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Daniel. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from > > Ram. > > > > dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-11 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Daniel. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from > Ram. > > drm-misc maintainers: Please pull, there's a drm doc patch follow-up > that

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/component-typed

2019-02-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, Here's the typed component topic branch. drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from Ram. drm-misc maintainers: Please pull, there's a drm doc patch follow-up that I want to stuff into drm-misc-next. Greg: The drm side missed our feature cutoff, so will on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drmp-cleanup for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next-queued

2019-01-07 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Jani, On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 12:00:49PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > I embarked on removing drmP.h includes from i915, but that requires a > bunch of drm header cleanup to add relevant includes and forward > declarations. Due to the timing, propagating the patches back to i915 > would take eons

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/drmp-cleanup for drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next-queued

2019-01-02 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Sean, Maarten & Maxime - I embarked on removing drmP.h includes from i915, but that requires a bunch of drm header cleanup to add relevant includes and forward declarations. Due to the timing, propagating the patches back to i915 would take eons, so Daniel suggested a topic branch to be merged

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix

2017-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:08 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter > Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:10:45 +0200 > >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Vetter >> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 08:10, David Miller wrote: > From

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix

2017-05-31 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 31 May 2017, David Miller wrote: > And we can't understand why respinning with the requested change is > less work than making several postings such as this one. When our CI hits tons of non-drm issues every merge window, I imagine our developers can start to get a little frustrated tryin

  1   2   3   >