> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 4:45 PM
> To: Murthy, Arun R ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; Zanoni, Paulo R ;
> tprev...@gmail.com; Shankar, Uma ; Murthy, Arun R
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] drm/i915/dp: wait
> -Original Message-
> From: Murthy, Arun R
> Sent: Monday, July 4, 2022 11:07 AM
> To: Shankar, Uma ; Nikula, Jani
> ;
> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; Zanoni, Paulo R ;
> tprev...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCHv3] drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout be
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nikula, Jani
> > Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 4:45 PM
> > To: Murthy, Arun R ;
> > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; Zanoni, Paulo R
> > ; tprev...@gmail.com; Shankar, Uma
> > ; Murthy, Arun R
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] d
On Fri, 01 Jul 2022, Arun R Murthy wrote:
> On linktraining error/timeout before retry need to wait for 400usec as
> per the DP CTS spec1.2
>
> The patch with commit 74ebf294a1dd ("drm/i915: Add a delay in Displayport
> AUX transactions for compliance testing")
> removes this delay mentioning the
On linktraining error/timeout before retry need to wait for 400usec as
per the DP CTS spec1.2
The patch with commit 74ebf294a1dd ("drm/i915: Add a delay in Displayport
AUX transactions for compliance testing")
removes this delay mentioning the hardware already meets this requirement,
but as per th
