om; Roper, Matthew D;
Bradford, Robert; Matheson, Annie J; kausalmall...@gmail.com; Vetter, Daniel
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 14/23] drm/i915: CHV: Pipe level degamma
correction
Yes, please note that as per the discussion, the legacy gamma IOCTL is still
existing, to maintain the backward co
, Matthew D; Bradford, Robert; Matheson, Annie
J; kausalmall...@gmail.com; Vetter, Daniel
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 14/23] drm/i915: CHV: Pipe level degamma
correction
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:27:17PM +, Smith, Gary K wrote:
> Unless legacy mode enables it of course.
I thought
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:27:17PM +, Smith, Gary K wrote:
> Unless legacy mode enables it of course.
I thought we decided to ignore legacy gamma stuff (at least for now, until
someone complains about the inconsistency). So yeah, I think we're fine.
-Daniel
>
> Thanks
> Gary
>
>
> "Smith,
@gmail.com>; Vetter, Daniel
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 14/23] drm/i915: CHV: Pipe level degamma
correction
Unless legacy mode enables it of course.
Thanks
Gary
"Smith, Gary K" mailto:gary.k.sm...@intel.com>> wrote:
Bear in mind that it will only happen after the prop
el-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; emil.l.veli...@gmail.com; Roper, Matthew D;
Bradford, Robert; Matheson, Annie J; kausalmall...@gmail.com; Vetter, Daniel
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 14/23] drm/i915: CHV: Pipe level degamma
correction
Unless legacy mode enables it of course.
Thanks
Gary
"Sm
Unless legacy mode enables it of course.
Thanks
Gary
"Smith, Gary K" wrote:
Bear in mind that it will only happen after the property has been set.
Initially there will be no clients setting the property - so I think it should
be OK.
Thanks
Gary
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015
Bear in mind that it will only happen after the property has been set.
Initially there will be no clients setting the property - so I think it should
be OK.
Thanks
Gary
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:39:54PM +, Bish, Jim wrote:
>
>
> On 10/19/2015 11:54 AM, Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:39:54PM +, Bish, Jim wrote:
>
>
> On 10/19/2015 11:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:08:52PM +, Smith, Gary K wrote:
> >> FYI - this shouldn't block the commits, but should be optimized later
> >> (fairly soon).
> >>
> >> I believe the
On 10/19/2015 11:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:08:52PM +, Smith, Gary K wrote:
>> FYI - this shouldn't block the commits, but should be optimized later
>> (fairly soon).
>>
>> I believe the current implementation ends up executing
>> while (count < C
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:08:52PM +, Smith, Gary K wrote:
> FYI - this shouldn't block the commits, but should be optimized later (fairly
> soon).
>
> I believe the current implementation ends up executing
> while (count < CHV_DEGAMMA_MAX_VALS) {
> // Do
FYI - this shouldn't block the commits, but should be optimized later (fairly
soon).
I believe the current implementation ends up executing
while (count < CHV_DEGAMMA_MAX_VALS) {
// Do lots of caclulation
I915_WRITE(cgm_degamma_reg
CHV/BSW supports Degamma color correction, which linearizes all
the non-linear color values. This will be applied before Color
Transformation.
This patch does the following:
1. Attach deGamma property to CRTC
2. Add the core function to program DeGamma correction values for
CHV/BSW platform
2.
12 matches
Mail list logo
