Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-09-22 Thread Navare, Manasi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:27:35PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:18:33PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:21:26PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:23:35PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-09-22 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:18:33PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:21:26PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:23:35PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:42:21PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > > > From: Maarten Lankhorst

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-09-21 Thread Navare, Manasi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:21:26PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:23:35PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:42:21PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > > From: Maarten Lankhorst > > > > > > Enabling is done in a special sequence and so should plane

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-09-14 Thread Navare, Manasi
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:23:35PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:42:21PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > > From: Maarten Lankhorst > > > > Enabling is done in a special sequence and so should plane updates > > be. Ideally the end user never notices the second pipe is used

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-09-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:42:21PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > From: Maarten Lankhorst > > Enabling is done in a special sequence and so should plane updates > be. Ideally the end user never notices the second pipe is used, > so use the vblank evasion to cover both pipes. > > This way ideally

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-08-24 Thread Navare, Manasi
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:42:21PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > From: Maarten Lankhorst > > Enabling is done in a special sequence and so should plane updates > be. Ideally the end user never notices the second pipe is used, > so use the vblank evasion to cover both pipes. > > This way ideally

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/11] drm/i915: Add intel_update_bigjoiner handling.

2020-07-15 Thread Manasi Navare
From: Maarten Lankhorst Enabling is done in a special sequence and so should plane updates be. Ideally the end user never notices the second pipe is used, so use the vblank evasion to cover both pipes. This way ideally everything will be tear free, and updates are really atomic as userspace expe