On 26/02/2016 09:13, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Hi,
The below answers are reasonable. So v6 should be the version.
Are you planning on looking at the other patches first or are you going
to wait until v6 is posted?
Thanks,
John.
___
Intel-gfx mailing
Hi,
The below answers are reasonable. So v6 should be the version.
Regards, Joonas
On pe, 2016-02-19 at 17:03 +, John Harrison wrote:
> On 19/02/2016 13:03, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now the code is in reviewable chunks, excellent!
> >
> > I've added my comments below. A
On 19/02/2016 13:03, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Hi,
Now the code is in reviewable chunks, excellent!
I've added my comments below. A few repeats from last round, but now
with more questions about the logic itself.
On to, 2016-02-18 at 14:26 +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harri
Hi,
Now the code is in reviewable chunks, excellent!
I've added my comments below. A few repeats from last round, but now
with more questions about the logic itself.
On to, 2016-02-18 at 14:26 +, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison
>
> Initial creation of scheduler sourc
From: John Harrison
Initial creation of scheduler source files. Note that this patch
implements most of the scheduler functionality but does not hook it in
to the driver yet. It also leaves the scheduler code in 'pass through'
mode so that even when it is hooked in, it will not actually do very
m
