Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-04-12 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:06:27PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:12 +0200 > Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform > > > reference confi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-04-12 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:12 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform > > reference config (specified through the PWM lookup table, DT definition or > > directly hard

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-04-12 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:20:29 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:12 +0200 > > Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > Currently the PWM core

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-04-12 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:12 +0200 > Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform > > > reference confi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-04-12 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:12 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform > > reference config (specified through the PWM lookup table, DT definition or > > directly hard

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-04-12 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform > reference config (specified through the PWM lookup table, DT definition or > directly hardcoded in PWM drivers). > > Create a pwm_args struct to store this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-03-31 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote: > @@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity { > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED, > }; > > +/** > + * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments > + * @period: reference period > + * @polarity: reference polarity > + * > + * This structure describe board-dependent arguments attached

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-03-31 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:55:10 -0700 Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > @@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity { > > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED, > > }; > > > > +/** > > + * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments > > + * @period: reference period > > + * @polarity: reference polarit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-03-31 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:55:10 -0700 Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > @@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity { > > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED, > > }; > > > > +/** > > + * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments > > + * @period: reference period > > + * @polarity: reference polarit

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

2016-03-30 Thread Boris Brezillon
Currently the PWM core mixes the current PWM state with the per-platform reference config (specified through the PWM lookup table, DT definition or directly hardcoded in PWM drivers). Create a pwm_args struct to store this reference config, so that PWM users can differentiate the current config fr