Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-08-15 Thread Marcos Paulo de Souza
Hi list, I have an Asus laptop, and these two patches solved my problem with bright hot-keys not working[1]. I applied both patches on 4.8-rc1, and the only necessary fix was changing priv_dev->dev to priv_dev->drm in all places of for_each_* macros touched by these patches. Is there any chance

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-07-12 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 01-07-16 om 15:51 schreef Jani Nikula: > On Fri, 01 Jul 2016, Rainer Koenig wrote: >> Found a problem: After screensaver kicked in and display was turned off >> the brightness keys stop working. >> >> Problem can be reproduced like that: >> >> 1. Boot laptop >> 2. Test brightness keys, they are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-07-01 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 01 Jul 2016, Rainer Koenig wrote: > Found a problem: After screensaver kicked in and display was turned off > the brightness keys stop working. > > Problem can be reproduced like that: > > 1. Boot laptop > 2. Test brightness keys, they are working > 3. open Terminal and issue "xset -displa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-07-01 Thread Rainer Koenig
Found a problem: After screensaver kicked in and display was turned off the brightness keys stop working. Problem can be reproduced like that: 1. Boot laptop 2. Test brightness keys, they are working 3. open Terminal and issue "xset -display :0 dpms force off" 4. the screen goes blank (like after

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-06-30 Thread Rainer Koenig
Am 29.06.2016 um 17:36 schrieb Jani Nikula: > This is v4 of [1]. The first three have already been pushed to > drm-intel-next-queued. The only change here is the atomic commit. > > Review and testing would be much appreciated to move this forward. For > testing, I've pushed this to opregion-didl-v4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-06-29 Thread Peter Wu
Hi Jani, I just tested your branch (2f9a317) and can confirm that the fix is still valid. evtest reports brightness up/down events. Kind regards, Peter https://lekensteyn.nl (pardon my brevity, top-posting and formatting, sent from my phone) On 29 June 2016 17:36:40 CEST, Jani Nikula wrote: >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/i915/opregion: proper handling of DIDL and CADL

2016-06-29 Thread Jani Nikula
This is v4 of [1]. The first three have already been pushed to drm-intel-next-queued. The only change here is the atomic commit. Review and testing would be much appreciated to move this forward. For testing, I've pushed this to opregion-didl-v4 branch of my repo at [2]. Maarten, please check the