Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/i915: Bump gen7+ fb size limits to 16kx16k

2018-09-26 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:59:03PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-09-25 20:37:14) > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > With gtt remapping in place we can use arbitrarily large > > framebuffers. Let's bump the limits to 16kx16k on gen7+. > > The limit was chosen to match the m

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/i915: Bump gen7+ fb size limits to 16kx16k

2018-09-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-09-25 20:37:14) > From: Ville Syrjälä > > With gtt remapping in place we can use arbitrarily large > framebuffers. Let's bump the limits to 16kx16k on gen7+. > The limit was chosen to match the maximum 2D surface size > of the 3D engine. > > With the remapping we coul

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/i915: Bump gen7+ fb size limits to 16kx16k

2018-09-25 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä With gtt remapping in place we can use arbitrarily large framebuffers. Let's bump the limits to 16kx16k on gen7+. The limit was chosen to match the maximum 2D surface size of the 3D engine. With the remapping we could easily go higher than that for the display engine. However