Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/uapi: reject set_domain for discrete

2021-07-06 Thread Ramalingam C
On 2021-07-05 at 14:53:10 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need > any flushing since everything is already coherent, so really all this > does is an object wait, for which we have an ioctl. Longer term the > desired caching should be an

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/uapi: reject set_domain for discrete

2021-07-05 Thread Matthew Auld
The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need any flushing since everything is already coherent, so really all this does is an object wait, for which we have an ioctl. Longer term the desired caching should be an immutable creation time property for the BO, which can be set