On pe, 2016-10-07 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
> can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
> Unfortunately, their lifetime is bound to vm. This is not a huge problem
> when we're not us
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:39:22PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
> can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
> Unfortunately, their lifetime is bound to vm. This is not a huge problem
> when we'r
Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
Unfortunately, their lifetime is bound to vm. This is not a huge problem
when we're not using softpin - drm_mm is creating an upper bound on used
range by c