Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] Documentation patch for batchbuffer submission

2018-03-27 Thread Rogovin, Kevin
Hi, >>Call out GEM_EXECBUFFER as deprecated. > Oh not it isn't. _WR has a singular purpose that isn't even the recommend > method any more. I had understood that DRM_I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER was considered deprecated. I will fix this mistake on next spin. I had thought that DRM_i915_GEM_EXECBUF

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] Documentation patch for batchbuffer submission

2018-03-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting kevin.rogo...@intel.com (2018-03-27 11:26:14) > From: Kevin Rogovin > > Note: I want to make a one or two follow-up series that provide > narration and potentially additional documentation for GUC submission > and the breadcrumbs. > > v3: >More documentation: emphasize that handling

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] Documentation patch for batchbuffer submission

2018-03-27 Thread kevin . rogovin
From: Kevin Rogovin Note: I want to make a one or two follow-up series that provide narration and potentially additional documentation for GUC submission and the breadcrumbs. v3: More documentation: emphasize that handling of batchbuffer requests creates a request struct that is added to t