Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers

2021-09-21 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 01:10:29PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: Consolidate down to just a single 'fwtable' implementation. For reads we don't need to worry about shadow tables. Also, the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check we previously had in the fwtable implementation can be dropped --- if a register is ou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers

2021-09-21 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 10/09/2021 21:10, Matt Roper wrote: Consolidate down to just a single 'fwtable' implementation. For reads we don't need to worry about shadow tables. Also, the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check we previously had in the fwtable implementation can be dropped --- if a register is outside that range on

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers

2021-09-10 Thread Matt Roper
Consolidate down to just a single 'fwtable' implementation. For reads we don't need to worry about shadow tables. Also, the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check we previously had in the fwtable implementation can be dropped --- if a register is outside that range on one of the old platforms, then it won't be