On 13/01/2017 08:47, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 08:44:34AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 12/01/2017 21:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
In the next few patches, we will depend upon there being no
uninitialised bits inside the ggtt_view. To ensure this we add the
__packed attribute a
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 08:44:34AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2017 21:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >In the next few patches, we will depend upon there being no
> >uninitialised bits inside the ggtt_view. To ensure this we add the
> >__packed attribute and double check with a build on t
On 12/01/2017 21:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
In the next few patches, we will depend upon there being no
uninitialised bits inside the ggtt_view. To ensure this we add the
__packed attribute and double check with a build on that gcc hasn't
expanded the struct to include some padding bytes.
Signed-o
In the next few patches, we will depend upon there being no
uninitialised bits inside the ggtt_view. To ensure this we add the
__packed attribute and double check with a build on that gcc hasn't
expanded the struct to include some padding bytes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i9
