Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2019-01-10 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:34:36PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 06:21 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it was > > a bit confusing. > > > > So it went from: > > ~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i91

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2019-01-09 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 06:21 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it was > a bit confusing. > > So it went from: > ~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status > Sink_Support: yes > PSR mode: PSR1 > Enabled: yes > Busy front

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2019-01-03 Thread Souza, Jose
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 193823048f96..13005d5306ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -2529,7 +2529,8 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_psr_sink_status); static void psr_sou

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs

2019-01-03 Thread José Roberto de Souza
The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it was a bit confusing. So it went from: ~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status Sink_Support: yes PSR mode: PSR1 Enabled: yes Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x000 Main link in standby mode: no HW Enabled & Active bit: yes Sour