On 6/28/21 12:20 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 28/06/2021 10:38, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi,
On 6/28/21 11:12 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 28/06/2021 08:41, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 6/25/21 2:27 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem
only
p
On 28/06/2021 10:38, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi,
On 6/28/21 11:12 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 28/06/2021 08:41, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 6/25/21 2:27 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem only
placements on DGFX this should be WB. On DG1
Hi,
On 6/28/21 11:12 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 28/06/2021 08:41, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 6/25/21 2:27 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem only
placements on DGFX this should be WB. On DG1 everything is snooped,
always, and so should b
On 28/06/2021 08:41, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 6/25/21 2:27 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem only
placements on DGFX this should be WB. On DG1 everything is snooped,
always, and so should be coherent.
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT looks like it'
On 6/25/21 2:27 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem only
placements on DGFX this should be WB. On DG1 everything is snooped,
always, and so should be coherent.
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT looks like it's for the aperture which is now gone
for DGFX,
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem only
placements on DGFX this should be WB. On DG1 everything is snooped,
always, and so should be coherent.
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT looks like it's for the aperture which is now gone
for DGFX, so hopefully can also be safely rejected.
