On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:28 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:24:35PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Atm, an invalid enable_rc6 module option will be silently ignored, so
> > emit an info message about it. Doing an early sanitization we can also
> > reuse intel_enable_rc6() in a
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:24:35PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm, an invalid enable_rc6 module option will be silently ignored, so
> emit an info message about it. Doing an early sanitization we can also
> reuse intel_enable_rc6() in a follow-up patch to see if RC6 is actually
> enabled. Currently
Atm, an invalid enable_rc6 module option will be silently ignored, so
emit an info message about it. Doing an early sanitization we can also
reuse intel_enable_rc6() in a follow-up patch to see if RC6 is actually
enabled. Currently the caller would have to filter a non-zero return
value based on th
