Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions

2021-01-19 Thread Gupta, Anshuman
> -Original Message- > From: Jani Nikula > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 2:16 PM > To: Gupta, Anshuman > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Anshuman Gup

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions

2021-01-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Anshuman Gupta wrote: > On 2021-01-08 at 19:44:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> @@ -1366,20 +1352,21 @@ void intel_pps_encoder_reset(struct intel_dp >> *intel_dp) >> * Reinit the power sequencer, in case BIOS did something nasty > IMHO above comment

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions

2021-01-13 Thread Anshuman Gupta
On 2021-01-08 at 19:44:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Once you realize there is no need to hold the pps mutex when calling > pps_init_timestamps() in intel_pps_init(), we can reuse > intel_pps_encoder_reset() which has the same code. > > Since intel_dp_pps_init() is only called from one place now,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions

2021-01-08 Thread Jani Nikula
Once you realize there is no need to hold the pps mutex when calling pps_init_timestamps() in intel_pps_init(), we can reuse intel_pps_encoder_reset() which has the same code. Since intel_dp_pps_init() is only called from one place now, move it inline to remove one "init" function altogether. Fin