Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/guc: drop negative doorbell alloc selftest

2018-10-18 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-10-18 13:21:33) > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:46:05 +0200, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio > wrote: > > > The test requires driver tweaks to avoid causing error messages > > on intentionally-triggered errors and to stop accessing non > > existing register. However, this is a pu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/guc: drop negative doorbell alloc selftest

2018-10-18 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 02:46:05 +0200, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: The test requires driver tweaks to avoid causing error messages on intentionally-triggered errors and to stop accessing non existing register. However, this is a pure GuC FW interface test and should be covered by FW validation

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/guc: drop negative doorbell alloc selftest

2018-10-17 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
The test requires driver tweaks to avoid causing error messages on intentionally-triggered errors and to stop accessing non existing register. However, this is a pure GuC FW interface test and should be covered by FW validation, so it isn't really worth tweaking the driver for it and we're better o