Re-add intel-gfx for real ...
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Re-adding intel-gfx for the testing discussion.
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Shobhit Kumar
> wrote:
btw for command mode support I'd really like to see an automated
testcase. Ville has done a
On 11/11/2013 02:20 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 03:19:01PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
Hi All -
These patches enhance the current support for MIPI DSI for Baytrail. They
continue on the sub-encoder design and a
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 03:19:01PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> > Hi All -
> > These patches enhance the current support for MIPI DSI for Baytrail. They
> > continue on the sub-encoder design and adds few more dev_ops to handle
> >
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 03:19:01PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> Hi All -
> These patches enhance the current support for MIPI DSI for Baytrail. They
> continue on the sub-encoder design and adds few more dev_ops to handle
> sequence correctly. Major changes are -
>
> 1. DSI Clock calculation bas
Hi All -
These patches enhance the current support for MIPI DSI for Baytrail. They
continue on the sub-encoder design and adds few more dev_ops to handle
sequence correctly. Major changes are -
1. DSI Clock calculation based on pixel clock
2. Add new dev_ops for better sequencing the enable/disab
