On 2023/7/25 13:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The reason why the first five attempts had bugs is because we are
trying to write it in the most complicated way possible, shifting by
logical not what?
Wonderful! Should I add your name as signed-of-by?
I will send a v3 patch later.
Really thanks for you
On 2023/7/25 01:35, Andi Shyti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:32:17AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
Clang warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c:
line 991, column 22 Division by zero.
Assuming tv_mode->oversample=1 and (!tv_mode->progressive)=1,
then division by zero will happen.
Fixes: 1bb
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:21:50AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> On 2023/7/25 13:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The reason why the first five attempts had bugs is because we are
> > trying to write it in the most complicated way possible, shifting by
> > logical not what?
> Wonderful! Should I add your name
The reason why the first five attempts had bugs is because we are
trying to write it in the most complicated way possible, shifting by
logical not what?
regards,
dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c
index 36b479b46b60..6997b
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:32:17AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> Clang warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c:
> line 991, column 22 Division by zero.
> Assuming tv_mode->oversample=1 and (!tv_mode->progressive)=1,
> then division by zero will happen.
>
> Fixes: 1bba5543e4fe ("drm/i915: Fix TV
Clang warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tv.c:
line 991, column 22 Division by zero.
Assuming tv_mode->oversample=1 and (!tv_mode->progressive)=1,
then division by zero will happen.
Fixes: 1bba5543e4fe ("drm/i915: Fix TV encoder clock computation")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui
---
drivers/gpu/
